Lenard Bradford-Bey

The Dual System of Law Effectuated By The 14th Amendment

The United States Constitution is an international agreement between the state/nations of America i.e. the Union-"The United States of America".

This measure will cover the particulars of the "dual legal system" that has been established by the 14th amendment to the Constitution of the Untied States. Its subject matter will encompass a general overview of adverse conditions of which said amendment has set forth in regard to the Freedom arid Liberty of Americans. Matters included herein will be in reference to the police power of the state in relation to its application to the several citizen (i.e. nationals) members of any given state; moreover, any such state's relations with other nationals of the American union. To set premise of this legal matter, the following is set forth and discussed:


To establish the true essence of the American governmental system in its original premise, one must imagine that the government of the federation (the "United States") does not exist. in such case, that would make each state m the Union a separate country; accordingly, under the rules that are set forth by international law, a state is a nation. See such terms defined below:

STATE. A people permanently occupying a fixed territory bound together by common law habits and custom into one body politic exercising, through the medium of an organized government, independent sovereignty and control over all persons and things within its boundaries, capable of making war and peace and of entering into international relations with other communities of the globe. Black's Law, sixth edition.
NATION. Nations or states* are independent bodies politic; societies of men united together for the purpose of promoting their mutual safety and advantage by the joint efforts of their combined strength. Bouvier's Law, 1856 *[ie state=nation).

The foregoing 15 the international definition of "state" and "nation". Now, adding the federal government back into the equation, the constitution for the united States of America is nothing more than an international agreement (or compact/charter) between the several republic of America and their respective nations. Accordingly, in the forming of the American federation each state of the Union gave up some of their inherent, rights of statehood that they possessed under the general rules of International law. However, one such right they did not give up is their respective and individual nations. This is further found exemplified in the protectional provisions that are set forth by the Ninth and Tenth Amendment in the Bill of Rights of the federal constitution.

To further expand on these premises, a citizen member of any particular nation carries the quality of nationality. See such defined below:

NATIONALITY. The state of a person in relation to the nation in which he was born. A man retains his nationality of origin during his minority, but, as in the case of his domicile of origin, he may change his nationality upon attaining full age; he cannot, however, renounce his allegiance without permission of thegovernment. Bouvier's Law, 1856

In reference to domicile, such is in direct relation to one's presence in a country. In reference to one's allegiance, such is to the nation or state of origin, or his membership thereof. In further reference of nationality and allegiance that is inherent to our system of law, one has always been able to change his nationality within the Union; such terms below encompass this legal issue:

COUNTRY. By country is meant the state of which one is a member. Every man's country is in general the state in which he happens to have been born. Bouvier's Law, 1856.
. the voluntary act of abandoning one's country and becoming the citizen (and national) or subject of another. Bouvier's Law, 1856.
NATURALIZATION. The conferring of the nationality of a state upon a person after birth, by any means whatsoever. Ballentine's Law, 1969.

Unknown to most Americans, such matter of natural right is available; however, for political reasons, it has been kept a secret, which will be briefly discussed in the next parts.

IN CONCLUSION: In clear sense, all such qualities make up the international, and constitutional de jure, premise of the Union-that is to say-each state is clearly a nation by right. Accordingly, the United States of America in pure legal sense, which is based on the law of nations (natural law), is not a state, nation or country; hence, one cannot have the nationality of such. To truly maintain nationality land is required. The "United States" does (did) not possess land to support premise of nationality; hence, the "United States" is not a state or a nation, in regards to its composite stature as the government of the Union. The "United States" in simple sense is a "corporate body" that has been contracted by the several American nation. to handle certain affairs.


It is of common knowledge that after the American Civil War the Union went through some dramatic changes. Among these changes was a a dominant makeover of the Union's constitutional system. Such changes included amendments to be made to the federal Constitution, which are commonly known as the reconstruction amendments-they are the 13th, 14th and 15th. As the people of America have been taught, they believe that the purpose of these amendments were of purpose to administer civil rights to the slaves. All such amendments have served such purpose; however, such measures have eroded the civil law of America-the common law.

Consequently, over the past 100 and thirty+ years, such civil law has been destroyed and has been tacitly transferred to the police power of the federal and state governments. This has been implicitly accomplished by section 1 of the fourteenth amendment; of an which such legal operation is set forth: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. " This clause is referred to as the "naturalization clause". In legal operation, it naturalizes everyone born in America to be federal citizens at birth; however, such citizenship is voluntary.

It must be established that the fourteenth amendment citizenship develops a character that is somewhat repugnant to natural and international law. In fact, said amendment induced a commercial based constitutional system of law. That is to say- everything that is encompassed in the governmental de facto system is of a contractual nature, which imports the creation of legal fictions and creates several conflicts of law. Another repugnant factor that coexists with this citizenship de facto is the unnatural allegiance to the "United States" that is imposed.

Accordingly, Americans do not realize that they have given up their liberties by not expressly terminating the de facto citizenship at their age of majority; moreover, they further consent (in a tacitly made commercial style agreement) to the induced constitutional system and unnatural franchised citizenship by voting; such being set up by section 2 of the fourteenth amendment. Conformably, said section of the amendment further establishes the "new apportionment" of federal representation, amongst the states of the Union, and also sets up the "new, or rather alternate," state governments, which as a matter of law, are de facto (insurgent). The law that is established under the fourteenth amendment is private law; hence, the states, and federal government, only represent voting federal citizens, as being set forth by the legal operations of section 2 of the fourteenth amendment. Consequently, this is where the dual system of law is set forth: 1) The private law that is caused by the fourteenth amendment; and, 2) The public law that is inherent in the original form of the constitutional system, which includes, as nothing has been repealed, the public law of each state (which is encompassed in their respective constitutions) and the public law that is set forth by the original form of the Constitution of the United States.

To further illustrate the establishment of the dual system of law, we must undertake what has truly transpired in relation to section 2 of the fourteenth amendment.

Based on the rules which are set forth and established by the law of nations (and the alternate 13th amendment) one cannot be subordinate to the dominion of another without his consent; hence, by using syntax (or rather, by applying sentence structure to section 2 of he fourteenth amendment you will find the following relevant wording set forth in stealthiness: ".. the right to vote. .. i.e. denied.. ..except for participation in rebelion, or other crime." In essence what this accomplishes is an unwritten contractual agreement by a native, now naturalized, "citizen of the United States" (federal citizen) to unwittingly give up his de jure law form and accept the de facto law form, which is in essence the police power of the federal and state legislatures (i.e., voluntary servitude); such as established by the diabolical fourteenth amendment system.

In reference to said system, in simple terms, the state legislatures are acting in a quasi-war mode due to the induced voting rebellion (i.e. police state). A U.S. citizen is in breach of allegiance to his native state by tacitly and unwittingly, declaring that he accepts the alternate governmental system. He is then controlled by statutory law; state and federal, over his de jure law form, which is the common law. All such citizens are considered belligerents along with the nationals that run the state governments de facto. In rudimentary form of the constitutional system of the Union, the legislatures could not create law that effected citizens at large; hence, some of the law established by the statutory scheme is pursuant to international rules of war.

As the law has been applied and is fundamentally being followed, the general constitutional provisions that have been craftily utilized to create this "Quiet War" can be found in the body of the original Constitution in Article IV, section 4- "The United States shall ...protect each of them (the several states) against Invasion and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive, against domestic Violence." in fact, this establishes a system of law that is based on maritime principles. Unknown to Americans, all courts of the United States, state and federal, are being operated under the principles of such law; hence, note that all the courts in the United States of America have military flags in them (which are regular flags with gold fringe).

Accordingly, the states (governments) are acting in a quasi-de jure capacity and asserting their sovereignty over their citizens de facto. Voting Americans, or, as they also have accepted this system, all United States citizens, have voluntarily been induced to unwittingly: 1) Become enemies of the State; 2) Become residents of their states (hence, are not true nationals under the law of nations); 3) Accept a feudal system of law (and land ownership); thus, 4) Give up their natural right to sovereignty that is protected by their state constitutions (and the law of nations).

IN CONCLUSION: Although the American governmental system of law, along with its several nationalities, is preserved. This is evident- as nothing in the original federal constitution, has been repealed; thus, it is still in full force and effect. Under the rule of international of servitus, the de facto governmental system cannot be forced on people of America that wish not to participate in it; thus, the de facto statutory construction can only be applied to consenting U.S. Citizens; hence, is not mandatory for, thus- cannot be forced on, those who wish not to rebel against their de jure law to partake in the insurgent system.


In planned effect, these matters have created a legal, or rather- it should be said- an induced political phenomena - Federalism. The antithesis of federalism is- Nationalism.

To give a general background of the reasoning behind the two terms, the founding fathers, such as Thomas Jefferson, were concerned with the Federalists ulterior motives. Jefferson sensed that the Federalists were primarily interested in turning America into on big commercial plantation under theft rule. The Constitution axiomaticly reflects the general concerns of Jefferson- the document is obviously of commercial purpose by its predominate commerce clauses.

Accordingly, if, one would observe the political scheme of which evolved in America, he would establish that Jefferson ultimately over-threw the Federalists Party with his Democratic Republican Party, in the early 1800's. This took the Union of the control of the Elite (Federalists) and put them in control of theAmerican people. Soon after its establishment, the party, then split into two parties, which happened during the mid-1800's. The two parties are still in existence today- they are known as the Republicans and Democrats. These two parties, unbeknownst to most all Americans, are acting in stealthiness as the Federalists.

Our real system of American law allowed too much freedom. People were not controllable on a mass basis to direct their labors toward the goals of the Elite. The current feudal system has been induced by the unwitting voluntary system set forth by the fourteenth amendment. To keep matters in perpetual control of the Federalists (Elitists), socialism was introduced. Drafter of the Communist Manifesto (1848), Karl Marx, said: "Socialism leads to Communism."

To implement socialism on a Union wide basis, the fourteenth amendment was enrolled- via force of the Civil War. Such obvious, and yet convert, measures were of general purpose to tame and train the masses toward a.commercialistic economic slave force (for the Elite to profit).


When societies, which are small local communities, are not allowed to govern themselves through theft customs under the rule of natural law, social breakdown is prone. As many would agree, America has seen a total breakdown in society. This is largely due to the combining of states (nations) to act as one under the dictatorial control of the federal government. If America is to repair its apparent social degeneration, the police power of the states has to be negated and the civil common law has to be restored to the peoples (nations) of America.

As the real intent of the fourteenth amendment took well over a century to accomplish, we can find that Congress passed laws that made America one nationality. Such is found codified in Title 8 USC § 1401. Nationals and citizens of the United States at birth- [in part]: The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth- A person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof. Such is the language from the fourteenth amendment.

Fortunately, as this politically imposed nationality is a fraud, pursuant to international law, a remedy is provided. But in respect to one's true nationality, if one would further reference Title 8 of the United States Code, specifically section 1481, herein lies the personal cure. The federal nationality de facto can be legally terminated under said section. This puts a person back to his original status under the principles of the original constitutional system.

Then, under de jure constitutional premise, interference by the 'United States' is protected by the 9th and 10th Amendments in the Bill of Rights of the federal constitution. Such is set forth, or rather exemplified, in the following legal definitions found in Black's Law, sixth edition:

Constitutional Liberty or Freedom. Such freedom as is enjoyed by the citizens of a country or state under the protection of its constitution. The aggregate of those personal, civil, and political rights of the individual which are- guaranteed by the Constitution and secured against invasion by the government or any of its agencies.

Constitutional Rights. A right guaranteed to the citizen by the United States Constitution and state constitution and so guaranteed as to prevent legislative interference therewith.

Once the correction of one's status is accomplished, he is no longer under the jurisdiction of the police power of the federal or state governments. One is then an alien as to the de facto political system i.e. nation/body politic; moreover, one is also an alien in every state he is not a national of. This plays an important part in reference to the U.S. code in reference to protections and remedies.

Accordingly, as one is not longer in breach of allegiance to his state government when his status is corrected, he is protected under its unlawful actions. Such are called actions done under color of law. The term color of law is another way of saying private law, or the law created under the police power of the state legislature (as it is not of the common law i.e. custom and usage).

Under the fourteenth amendment system, de jure nationals (a ward in sense) are protected from such state actions by the federal government:

Title 18 USCA § 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law. (Criminal) [in part] Who ever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

Note that a person has to be an alien to be protected by actions done under the color of law. This means that a state employee or officer violates your natural rights that are secured by the federal, and state, constitutions, he can be put in jail; moreover, the state itself is not immune from such actions. They can be sued for their employees, officers, and their actions.

As the states are not paying their debts pursuant to money based on substance, as largely caused by the socialist system of government, the United States is bankrupt, and has been. All activity that they are involved in is fundamentally commercially based, such as-their money system, traffic citations, taxes, etc., etc.. Accordingly, it has been held that the state governments are not immune from their commercial activities against lawful Americans. As the de facto law system fundamentally sets up a system that is based on commercial law, the states are liable for all damages that are done to a person that is not willfully participating in the de facto political system.