|
|
|
Participation
agreement between the VCW, the City of Antwerp, the Social Welfare Service of
the municipality of Wilrijk and the Gypsies of the campsite of Wilrijk I. Introductory description Since
1998 the social worker of the organisation Vlaams Centrum Woonwagenwerk (VCW) in
the province of Antwerp noticed a lack of concern and motivation in the
activities of the local Social Welfare Service of Wilrijk (municipality of
Antwerp) towards the group of Gypsies (Rom) who reside on a campsite in the same
municipality. The responsible social worker of the welfare service didn’t
visit the caravans because he felt a negative approach coming from the Gypsies.
The negative contacts escalated in the systematic refusal of Gypsies demands for
social aid and the minimum income, even when they were accompanied by the social
worker of VCW. Several times the VCW asked to have a meeting with the head of
the social service, the answer was always negative: the Social Welfare Service
didn’t recognize the VCW as a working partner/collaborator. Even the campsite
supervisor, employed by the Integration Service of the City of Antwerp, wasn’t
able to have a constructive or positive interview with the Social Welfare
Service of Wilrijk. The
social worker of the VCW and the campsite supervisor tried another strategy to
force the Social Welfare Service to take action towards the Gypsies: every week
they visited the service accompanied by Gypsies, asking to take note of their
demand for social aid. Finally, the head of the department gave in and organised
a meeting. After this meeting, the head of department was convinced to do
something in this matter. There was only one problem: defending his idea before
the Council of the Social Welfare Service. To have more impact on the Council,
the head of department and the VCW decided to officially involve an important
partner: the City of Antwerp (the Integration Service). This was possible in
accordance with the new decree on the subject of the Flemish Policy with regard
to Ethno-cultural Minorities (see phase 1: description of the general context of
Gypsies and Travellers in Belgium, Flanders). The City of Antwerp involved
itself in the matter and took the responsibility of organising a conference
between the different partners to come to a working agreement. This resulted in
an agreements text in where the specific cooperation between the Social Welfare
Service, the VCW and the Integration Service of the city was stipulated and also
where the conditions to receive social aid were defined. One of the important
results of these negotiations was the development of an integration contract,
made especially for the Gypsies. At
present other Social Welfare Services apply this working method in their
contacts with Gypsies and Travellers. II. Process analysis 1. Starting point The
negative contacts and conflicts between the Gypsies of the local campsite and
the Social Welfare Service of Wilrijk made it impossible to have a mutual and
positive approach. The Social Welfare Service complained about the
non-cooperation of Gypsies during the social inquiries and about the confusing
family and social situations on the site. The VCW could not convince the
responsible social worker of the Welfare Service to observe the situation in a
more objective way. After several years of no improvement, the social worker of
the VCW tried to force new demands of Gypsies for social aid. Gert only took
action when he received support and full cooperation of the Gypsies. He
also received the support of the campsite supervisor, employed by the
Integration Service of the City of Antwerp. Thanks to the systematic
opposition of the VCW when receiving negative results and to the positive
attitude of the head of the social department of the Social Welfare Service,
a first favourable discussion between the partners took place. The VCW-worker situated
the problems of the Gypsies and noticed some interest from the head of the
department. They decided to take action to increase the social integration of
the local Gypsies. But to convince the Council (the decisive authority) of the
Social Welfare Service to approve these actions towards the Gypsies, the
partners had to use a stronger means of pressure. The Council consists of
members who are elected by the community council. These members are likely to
have a political preference and this could interfere their objective regard on
the Gypsy issue. A higher political partner could only achieve an
agreement from the Council; this partner was the City of Antwerp. There was no
personal political involvement to realise the first contacts. The use of the new
decree on the subject of the Flemish Policy with regard to Ethno-cultural
Minorities was the only important positive political intervention in the
approach towards the Social Welfare Service. 2. Development An
official invitation for a first meeting with the VCW, the Social Welfare
Service and the Integration Service came from the City of Antwerp. The campsite
supervisor, Luc Laeremans, was the key person for the Integration Service, and
he kept his department informed. The positive attitude of the head
of the social workers of the Social Welfare Service, Leo Wijnants, made it
possible that the President of the Council showed no objection to this first
meeting. The Council finally understood, also under pressure of the social
workers of the service, that they had to find solutions for the specific
problems of the Gypsies. This doesn’t mean that the Council itself tried to
look for answers, they just gave Leo Wijnants the authority to participate
in these meetings and he had to keep them informed about the results.
Gert Devolder, social worker of the VCW was the third important actor. During
the first meeting the partners agreed to draw up a kind of manual on how to work
with Gypsies and how to approach their demands for social aid and the minimum
income. This plan also had to stipulate the concrete participation of
different partners. After
5 meetings a final document was prepared. The document consisted of: -
an introduction -
a general description of
the problem(s) -
a description of the
actual situation on the campsite of Wilrijk, -
further plans to
organise a school project with Gypsy toddlers in the same community -
the competences of the
Social Welfare Service when a demand for social aid is introduced by Gypsies -
the position of the
Labour Law Court when appealing to a negative decision of the Social Welfare
Service -
a proposition for cooperation
between the Social Welfare Service, the City of Antwerp and the VCW when doing a
social survey of the familial and social situation of the Gypsies
A
brief resume of the points of cooperation during the social survey: -
the City of Antwerp (the
Civil Service) can provide with information about the official situation
of the families residing on the campsite in Wilrijk. This is necessary to decide
if a person has the right to obtain the minimum income and to determine the
amount of the financial support. -
the
VCW can make a social report about the actual situation and can give a
motivated advise -
house calls by the
social worker of the Social Welfare Service should be done accompanied by
Gert of the VCW -
the Social Welfare
Service demands cooperation of every partner when determining the state
of need of the demander (when specifying the social, financial and familial
situation) -
the use of an
integration contract: to stipulate the conditions to receive social help. This
contents the condition to subscribe in language lessons, the condition to look
for a job, the condition of letting the children to school (starting from
toddlers), … But these conditions have to be approached within a reasonable
way. The age, the lack of education, or the familial situation can discharge
someone of these obligations. -
there will be no
obstruction when a person files in an appeal when receiving a negative
decision of the Social Welfare Service -
every new demand has to
be considered, taken in account every new element to determine the state of need When
a Gypsy introduces a demand for social help or a demand to obtain the minimum
income, the different partners have to act according to the agreement. The Gypsy
signs an integration contract with the Social Welfare Service, so both actors
are aware of the responsibility they have taken on. 3. Current moment At
present the VCW has frequent contacts with the Integration Service of the City
of Antwerp, and especially with Luc Laeremans, the campsite supervisor, to
discuss the problems on the site. The supervisor is systematic being involved
when the VCW organise different activities (for instance the school project for
toddlers in a school near the campsite). There
is also a good collaboration between the Social Welfare Service and the
VCW. A social worker of the Social Welfare Service visits regularly the
campsite and gives frequent feedback to the VCW. Gert plays an
important intermediary role at the decisive Council sessions. He acts as interpreter
for the Gypsies but he can gives an exact framework of the situation of the
Gypsies. The Social Welfare Service understands the position of the VCW and
stays objective when the VCW files an appeal for a Gypsy family who received a
negative decision. This doesn’t have any negative repercussions on the
relationship of both partners. At
this moment the VCW has a discussion with other Social Welfare Services of
municipalities of Antwerp who deal with Gypsies. The agreement of Wilrijk is
used as a discussion text. The different Social Services show a need to adjust
their working method to one another. Twice a year the VCW will call on a similar
meeting (will be invited: the different Social Services of Wilrijk, Mortsel,
Hoboken and Wommelgem, the responsible social workers and their heads of
department, the responsible person of the region of South-Antwerp, the
Integration Service of the City of Antwerp and the VCW). Also
at present the VCW and a school nearby the campsite are organising a special
school project for Gypsy toddlers. This idea rose when the parents were obliged
to put their children in kindergarten, as stipulated in the integration contract
they signed with the Social Welfare Service. The
school wanted to take some special measures towards these children to integrate
them better into our school system. This project is only in the development
phase. III. Results 14
families reside on the campsite of Wilrijk. The amounts of demands for social
aid are depending from the social and familial situation of the residents. The
Social Welfare Service, before the introduction of the integration contracts,
considered none of the demands. At present every demand is being taken in
consideration. The
contract has also an impact on the school attendances of the children of the
campsite. 10 out of the 14 families of the site have children who are of school
age. All the families who receive social welfare support are obliged to send
their children to school. This is one of the conditions stipulated in the
integration contract. After
the positive results in Wilrijk, other Social Welfare Services of other
municipalities and cities have introduced the integration contract for Gypsies
in their working method. We now count 5 municipalities who apply this method to
include Gypsies and Travellers in the social welfare aid. IV. Impact 1. Impact on the environment -
Development of a
partnership between the Social Welfare Service, the VCW and the City of
Antwerp: results in exchange of information and knowledge during meetings
and the development of a mutual agreements and participation text. -
The Social Welfare
Service is regarding the VCW as an official partner. The social worker of
the VCW is invited on every Council meeting to defend the Gypsies when a
decision about their demand for financial aid. And he is consulted by the social
worker of the Service during the social inquiry. His advice is being considered
when taking a decision. -
Thanks to an
introduction by the VCW, the social worker of the Social Welfare Service is
reassured when visiting the campsite. She receive counselling and guidance from
the VCW when necessary (he can provide with information about the correct
situation and about the cultural specifications of the Gypsies). -
The City of Antwerp
plays an important partner role. The city is responsible in registering
the legal residences and familial situations of the habitants of the campsite.
This information can be given to the Social Welfare Service when
necessary in their social inquiry. The intermediary of the VCW is no longer
responsible to provide this kind of (delicate) information about his target
group. -
The integration contract
and the working method are being copied by other Social Welfare Services
in Flanders. -
The Gypsies address
themselves more to the Social Welfare Service, not just for financial problems,
but also for administration problems. 2. Impact on the Gypsy population and the Social Welfare Service To
receive financial support by the Social Welfare Service, the Gypsies have to
fulfil certain conditions. These conditions are necessary to stimulate further
integration of the Gypsies in the society. Some of these conditions can be adapted
to the individual or familial situation of the demander. The
fulfilment of the conditions has some positive consequences concerning the
attitude of the Gypsies towards the non-Gypsy society. For
example: 1)
Young Gypsies have to follow a Dutch language course: -
they meet non-Gypsies in
a different context/relation -
some of them realise
that they aren’t the most ignorant of the group -
they have to respect a
time schedule and so they learn to plan their day -
young parents are more
capable of understanding the work the kids get at school 2)
Obligation to put toddlers in school: -
it raises the
involvement of Gypsies in a gadgo institution -
presence of parents and
grandparents at school activities -
they feel the need for
child activities during school holidays -
it gives the parents a
feeling of regaining freedom during school hours -
parents learn to plan a
school day: the kids have to be in school at time, they have to make lunch, … -
it raises the demand to
develop initiatives towards adults and older children (lessons to eliminate
illiteracy, …) And
progressively the Gypsies turn to the Social Welfare Service not only for
financial support, but also for other questions like social administration
problems. The Social Welfare Service learns to work with this difficult target
group. V.
Comments/Conclusions These
factors led to the success of the process: -
After several attempts
of confronting the Social Welfare Service with the problems and the demands
for social aid for Gypsies, Gert finally realized in getting the attention of
the head of the social department. -
The positive contacts
(formal and informal) between Gert and the head of department made it possible
to organise a meeting. Frequent meetings are resulting in a partnership. -
The positive attitude
of the head of department was an important factor in the progressive evolution
of the process. -
The involvement of
the third partner, the City of Antwerp, was necessary to give an official
and more formal cachet to the first meeting between VCW, Social Welfare
Service and the Integration Service. The Council felt the pressure of the
official institute, who used the new decree on the subject of the Flemish
Policy with regard to Ethno-cultural Minorities to convince them in agreeing in
having meetings with the VCW. They gave the head of the social department the
authority to be the actor in these conferences. -
Gert and the campsite
supervisor have frequent contacts about the situation of the habitants on
the site. When they take actions towards the Social Welfare Service, it is with combined
forces. -
Gert always involved
the Gypsies when he tried to force new demands for social aid or the minimum
income. At present he guides the Gypsies when they introduce a new demand
or when they receive help from the Social Welfare Service. He informs the
Gypsies about the different aspects of the integration contract and tries stimulating
them to have a positive attitude towards the Social Welfare Service. -
The City of Antwerp, the
Social Welfare Service and the Gypsies understand the position of the VCW
in this process. He is an intermediary who can be consulted by
every partner. -
It is necessary that the
VCW take on a guidance role towards the social workers of the Social
Welfare Service when concerning the problems of Gypsies. The knowledge
and experience of the VCW is important to gain a correct view of the situation. -
The Social Welfare
Service is obliged to keep the VCW informed about their actions towards
the Gypsies. This is important to avoid negative conflicts. -
The mutual agreements
between the different partners were made in a positive atmosphere and are
being systematic evaluated during partner meetings. -
After experienced the
practice of the integration contract, the Gypsies realise that it is important
to fulfil certain conditions when demanding social and financial support of our
society. This implicates conditions for them as well as for their children. It
makes the contacts with both societies easier. Positive examples are
necessary to attract other members of the target group. Transferability: The
positive results of the agreements and of the integration contract led to a
debate with other municipalities of Antwerp. They all saw the need of a
constructive and concrete working method when trying to reach the specific
target group of the Gypsies. Not only in Antwerp, but also in other parts of
Flanders, the VCW invites the local Social Welfare Services to think about
similar agreement texts. Also in these new cases, the VCW uses the Flemish
decree of the Policy with regard to Ethno-cultural Minorities. |